summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment3
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-06-17 08:59:31 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-06-17 08:59:31 +0800
commit1fc52d463b68e232cbb532f8af2f6e6e5e897c5f (patch)
treee0e8b56e626956c9d6968283270a398e9a8a3178 /assignment3
parent14e5b6bac21df789bcfd4993998ea4c7f5f45e2d (diff)
legal standing to appeal to the env court
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment3')
-rw-r--r--assignment3/background.tex5
-rw-r--r--assignment3/references.bib2
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/assignment3/background.tex b/assignment3/background.tex
index 84cef3b..e3f26ec 100644
--- a/assignment3/background.tex
+++ b/assignment3/background.tex
@@ -75,7 +75,10 @@ difficult for the public to challenge on technical grounds. If,
additionally, the application is not considered to have more than
minor impacts and is thus not publicly notified, it becomes very
difficult for members of the public to affect the outcome of the
-resource consent decision.
+resource consent decision. According to \textcite{mediation}, only
+those parties who made a submission on a notified application have
+legal standing to appeal a council's resource consent decision to the
+Environment Court.
% TODO: who has legal standing in this case?
% Do people have to resort to the Environment Court then?
diff --git a/assignment3/references.bib b/assignment3/references.bib
index 2ec45af..f941758 100644
--- a/assignment3/references.bib
+++ b/assignment3/references.bib
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
year={2007},
volume={???},
number={???},
- url={http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mediating+sustainability%3a+the+public+interest+mediator+in+the+New...-a0176372138}
+ url={http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mediating+sustainability\%3a+the+public+interest+mediator+in+the+New...-a0176372138}
}