diff options
| author | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-06-17 08:59:31 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-06-17 08:59:31 +0800 |
| commit | 1fc52d463b68e232cbb532f8af2f6e6e5e897c5f (patch) | |
| tree | e0e8b56e626956c9d6968283270a398e9a8a3178 | |
| parent | 14e5b6bac21df789bcfd4993998ea4c7f5f45e2d (diff) | |
legal standing to appeal to the env court
| -rw-r--r-- | assignment3/background.tex | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | assignment3/references.bib | 2 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/assignment3/background.tex b/assignment3/background.tex index 84cef3b..e3f26ec 100644 --- a/assignment3/background.tex +++ b/assignment3/background.tex @@ -75,7 +75,10 @@ difficult for the public to challenge on technical grounds. If, additionally, the application is not considered to have more than minor impacts and is thus not publicly notified, it becomes very difficult for members of the public to affect the outcome of the -resource consent decision. +resource consent decision. According to \textcite{mediation}, only +those parties who made a submission on a notified application have +legal standing to appeal a council's resource consent decision to the +Environment Court. % TODO: who has legal standing in this case? % Do people have to resort to the Environment Court then? diff --git a/assignment3/references.bib b/assignment3/references.bib index 2ec45af..f941758 100644 --- a/assignment3/references.bib +++ b/assignment3/references.bib @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ year={2007}, volume={???}, number={???}, - url={http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mediating+sustainability%3a+the+public+interest+mediator+in+the+New...-a0176372138} + url={http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mediating+sustainability\%3a+the+public+interest+mediator+in+the+New...-a0176372138} } |