summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-05-05 17:33:32 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-05-05 17:33:32 +0800
commit611c92e3019c16a583f3a797bcb4660f6003b870 (patch)
tree1e40023086876ed0c94bba472a69ddcd3ae60013 /assignment2
parent2f5e884f1ad1086b07978fd152769311a4c682c3 (diff)
add notes and instructor's help
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment2')
-rw-r--r--assignment2/help79
-rw-r--r--assignment2/scratch27
2 files changed, 106 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/assignment2/help b/assignment2/help
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..130558c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/assignment2/help
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Thanks for this timely question. Here is some advice:
+
+Step 1. Find a quiet relaxed place or mental space where you can take
+Assignment 2. Have a careful read of the assignment and what it asks you
+to do. When you're ready, engage in some creative visualisation of what a
+new dairy processing plant might look like, in terms of its size, where it
+might be located, possible proximity to a river, its likely rural location,
+but possible nearness to other dwellings, whether there might be other
+rural activities nearby, possibly even another dairy plant. If you've ever
+used SimCity or SimTown you should feel right at home!
+
+Step 2. Start making your list of possible environmental impacts that would
+likely need to be considered when assessing the proposal. If you've taken
+the RMA course or have an interest in an RMA focus, that's fine, but please
+keep your lens fully back, not too close. This is an EIA course, not an RMA
+course. It's ok if you keep your knowledge about RMA processes a bit
+hazy. You're not expected to know them. For example, you might think that
+the plant will need a regional council discharge consent, and definitely a
+land use consent, but it's ok if you don't mention these in any specific
+way, or refer to any specific sort of rural zoning issues. If they occur to
+you in your mind, it's fine to make a note of them. The case study itself
+it purposefully a bit hazy on details so as to allow you the freedom to
+consider a range of impacts.
+
+3. As you make your list, start thinking about how you might rank the
+effects. There are a couple of key course readings which will be helpful
+in this regard, and there is extra advice on the course page for this
+assignment. I recently added a list of EIA tools, which you might wish to
+run through as a reminder of potential effects. The plant will need to be
+constructed, which will produce some short term effects, and then there
+will be ongoing effects of one sort or another. Generally speaking, what
+might they be?
+
+4. Benchmark your work by running a Google search. I just ran one on
+environmental impacts dairy processing plant and found a lot of information
+from around the world.
+
+5. Narrow your benchmark by restricting your Google search to NZ sites.
+As part of your search check out one or two news items to see the kinds of
+impacts of a dairy processing operation that might get the local population
+or environmental watchdogs a bit riled. Flag these impacts (hint: EIA can
+include positive effects. What are some positive effects from a new dairy
+processing plant?) and include them in your assignment as possible impact
+bottlenecks that might add a weighting/loading in your ranking. Include
+them, and any other refs you have found useful, in a final reference
+list.
+
+6. Don't allow yourself to get distracted by trying to be too specific
+about particular indicators you might run across in your searches, such as
+actual permitted content of discharges, water chemistry, etc. This
+course doesn't expect you to be an engineer. Similarly, don't get
+distracted by reaching too far. You asked whether you need to consider
+the environmental impacts of dairy farming. The short answer is "no".
+Having said that, your question is really interesting, but reaches too
+far. You might really be asking "In assessing a possible resource
+consent for a dairy processing plant, does the RMA include provisions for
+considering the impact on the environment of producing the products it is
+receiving, as part of the overall decision to grant consent, or as part of
+any future consent conditions for the plant?" This question is
+interesting but goes beyond this assignment. Organisations like Greenpeace
+really push for this sort of power, for example to try to require
+reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to get consent for a
+coal-fired electrictiy generating station. But it's really an RMA issue
+that goes beyond this course.
+
+Having said that, feel free to comment generally on environmental best
+practice and how it might play out in terms of consent and monitoring
+conditions for the actual activities of the dairy plant once it gets up and
+running. This forms part of your assignment. If you're "RMA-keen", you'd be
+looking here at something called a 'best practicable option' for minimising
+discharge effects. Google the term and you'll find out more. It's over to
+you really in terms of how you want to use this course to gain general
+knowledge, or as a tool in a quest to become an RMA-savvy environmental
+practitioner. We try to be flexible in our marking to cater to different
+'angles' of approach. Have confidence that any benchmarking you do in
+Steps 4 and 5 will give you any additional support that you may need, or
+contact me for more clarity.
+
+Cheers and good luck with A2.
diff --git a/assignment2/scratch b/assignment2/scratch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4274aed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/assignment2/scratch
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+NZ water problems \parencite{cullen}:
+
+- water management through regional councils:
+ - regional policy statements + regional plans
+ - unless authorised by plan discharges require resource consents
+
+impact of agriculture on water:
+
+- primary source of non-point discharges
+ - application of fertiliser and pesticides
+ - discharges from the soil and animals
+ - materials move into surface and groundwater at higher rates than usual
+
+
+monitoring / significance implications:
+- lack of reliable data against which to draw conclusions for key parameters in all regions
+- lack of approved plans relating to water in some regions
+ - require councils to set realistic goals and objectives; difficult
+ because has to reconcile urban recreational and environmental
+ requirements with rural economic demands
+ - too little policy direction from central government
+- even without these plans, councils must process resource consent applications
+- lack of monitoring and enforcement
+ - low compliance
+ - impossible to determine the efficacy of management practices
+- limited knowledge on how to best deal with non-point source discharges
+- little knowledge about what the community wants and expects wrt water management \ No newline at end of file