blob: 63f1aeef0ec2ee748af12065d882d71c6f448c60 (
about) (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
|
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{mystyle}
\bibliography{references.bib}
% length: 3000 words
\begin{document}
\input{title}
\tableofcontents
\pagebreak
\input{intro} % 360 words
\input{background} % 2200 words
% consultation : 500 words
% AEE review and notification : 500 words
% submissions : 200 words
% case study 1 : 200 words
% case study 2 : 200 words
% implementation gap : 400 words
\input{conclusion} % 400 words
% Discuss the following statement:
%
% Councils often do not have the inclination to challenge an AEE,
% particularly if the development may bring benefits to the region. It
% therefore often falls to individuals or public interest groups to
% the thorn and challenge. \parencite[][pp. 110-111]{grinlinton}
%
% Your essay should consider the requirements for consultation in
% preparing assessments of environmental effects (AEEs) under the RMA,
% evidence supporting or refuting Grinlinton's statement and arrive at a
% conclusion on whether you agree or disagree with the statement based
% on the evidence you have identified.
%
% Illustrate your essay with practical examples. Use the material you
% have collected in your clippings file of current environmental issues
% for this.
- Consultation is not mandatory under the RMA, but is encouraged
- results from consultation / mediation process are not binding
- the majority of applications is not publicly notified (council survey)
- there is a history of underestimating the size of the group of `directly affected' people
- government wants to shift power from the local councils to
national entity, at the expense of community consultation
{\footnotesize{Approximate word count: 3000}}
\printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered]
\end{document}
|