summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment1
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-07 12:25:02 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-07 12:25:02 +0800
commitfc6060cbcc884070329a38d67a510349e6188fca (patch)
tree53da52eb419086fde96c609fc76cfacc1c7404f2 /assignment1
parented0edbf2409159de7aef3dc12e0f0c7110232867 (diff)
word count
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1')
-rw-r--r--assignment1/conclusion.tex29
-rw-r--r--assignment1/document.tex5
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/conclusion.tex b/assignment1/conclusion.tex
index f687b0d..1a0cc91 100644
--- a/assignment1/conclusion.tex
+++ b/assignment1/conclusion.tex
@@ -1,9 +1,26 @@
\section{Conclusion}
-TODO
+Although the RMA anticipated some of the core principles of SEA in
+that it provides an integrated framework for the assessment of
+policies, plans, and projects, insufficient monitoring and the lack of
+a well-defined process to feed assessment experiences at the local
+level back into nation-wide guidelines limits the suitability of the
+RMA for SEA. The fact that the RMA purposefully omits prescribing
+explicit assessment procedures does enable a more flexible approach to
+environmental assessment that is guided by local needs but has also
+allowed an overwhelming number of poor-quality assessments to enter
+the process.
-- plan formulation process is well defined, but AEE process is not
-- public participation in plan formulation is slowing down the process but makes it possible to represent a variety of values in screening and scoping rules
-- public participation in AEE is limited by the decision of many councils to not publically notify applications
-- the devolved mandate ... TODO
-- potential for SEA, but unused due to slow implementation \ No newline at end of file
+While the broad definitions of the terms `environment' and `effects',
+and the integration of EIA principles in the resource consent process
+do ensure that most proposals with potentially significant impacts
+fall under the activities that require assessment, the sheer volume of
+resource consents that are to be reviewed by local councils result in
+high workload which negatively affects the councils' consent review
+performance. The effects of these performance issues are particularly
+obvious in the disappointing monitoring practises and the severely
+limited opportunity for the general public to provide input on all but
+a minor fraction of resource consents. Since the lack of well-defined
+procedures allows local authorities to disregard the results of an
+assessment, it is unclear to what extent AEE is actually used as a
+means to promote sustainable development. \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/assignment1/document.tex b/assignment1/document.tex
index c39b289..5e7975d 100644
--- a/assignment1/document.tex
+++ b/assignment1/document.tex
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
% 200 words
\input{conclusion}
- \printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered]
+ {\footnotesize{Approximate word count: 2900}}
-\end{document}
+ \printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered]
+\end{document} \ No newline at end of file