diff options
author | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-07 12:25:02 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-07 12:25:02 +0800 |
commit | fc6060cbcc884070329a38d67a510349e6188fca (patch) | |
tree | 53da52eb419086fde96c609fc76cfacc1c7404f2 /assignment1 | |
parent | ed0edbf2409159de7aef3dc12e0f0c7110232867 (diff) |
word count
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1')
-rw-r--r-- | assignment1/conclusion.tex | 29 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | assignment1/document.tex | 5 |
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/conclusion.tex b/assignment1/conclusion.tex index f687b0d..1a0cc91 100644 --- a/assignment1/conclusion.tex +++ b/assignment1/conclusion.tex @@ -1,9 +1,26 @@ \section{Conclusion} -TODO +Although the RMA anticipated some of the core principles of SEA in +that it provides an integrated framework for the assessment of +policies, plans, and projects, insufficient monitoring and the lack of +a well-defined process to feed assessment experiences at the local +level back into nation-wide guidelines limits the suitability of the +RMA for SEA. The fact that the RMA purposefully omits prescribing +explicit assessment procedures does enable a more flexible approach to +environmental assessment that is guided by local needs but has also +allowed an overwhelming number of poor-quality assessments to enter +the process. -- plan formulation process is well defined, but AEE process is not -- public participation in plan formulation is slowing down the process but makes it possible to represent a variety of values in screening and scoping rules -- public participation in AEE is limited by the decision of many councils to not publically notify applications -- the devolved mandate ... TODO -- potential for SEA, but unused due to slow implementation
\ No newline at end of file +While the broad definitions of the terms `environment' and `effects', +and the integration of EIA principles in the resource consent process +do ensure that most proposals with potentially significant impacts +fall under the activities that require assessment, the sheer volume of +resource consents that are to be reviewed by local councils result in +high workload which negatively affects the councils' consent review +performance. The effects of these performance issues are particularly +obvious in the disappointing monitoring practises and the severely +limited opportunity for the general public to provide input on all but +a minor fraction of resource consents. Since the lack of well-defined +procedures allows local authorities to disregard the results of an +assessment, it is unclear to what extent AEE is actually used as a +means to promote sustainable development.
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/assignment1/document.tex b/assignment1/document.tex index c39b289..5e7975d 100644 --- a/assignment1/document.tex +++ b/assignment1/document.tex @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ % 200 words \input{conclusion} - \printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered] + {\footnotesize{Approximate word count: 2900}} -\end{document} + \printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered] +\end{document}
\ No newline at end of file |