summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment1
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-04 17:18:23 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-04 17:18:23 +0800
commitcd3a7190d95bc72eba8102539a0ac25fe40ecff3 (patch)
treee3c2b4578f18208982d64560d103aeb1512b9d12 /assignment1
parenta042c53083cd55be11217aff92c461fc74e04279 (diff)
structural changes
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1')
-rw-r--r--assignment1/discussion.tex6
-rw-r--r--assignment1/main.tex64
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/discussion.tex b/assignment1/discussion.tex
index 8ee1648..174c67a 100644
--- a/assignment1/discussion.tex
+++ b/assignment1/discussion.tex
@@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ of two years, the public was able to provide input on only 1,414
proposals.
- opportunities for public involvement?
+- limited opportunity for the public to influence decisions
- - limited opportunity for the public to influence decisions
+On the other hand, public participation ... leads to abuse, slow process miller2010implementing
@@ -89,9 +90,6 @@ governance, by district or city councils.
- cannot deal well with cumulative effects, because that's best done
on a national/regional level \parencite{eia-state-of-the-art}
-- most resource consents are processed at the district/city level, not
- at the regional level
-
- \textcite[p 267]{furuseth}: little experience or resources to
scrutinise EIA on the local level
diff --git a/assignment1/main.tex b/assignment1/main.tex
index 890e61c..5c01887 100644
--- a/assignment1/main.tex
+++ b/assignment1/main.tex
@@ -59,11 +59,17 @@ activities \parencite{principles}:
\subsubsection{The role of sustainable development}
+
+As the concept of sustainable development became more popular
+... scope of project-based impact assessment determined to be too
+narrow to ensure a progression towards sustainable
+development. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) ...
+
TODO:
-- EIA --> SEA
- broad definition of ``environment'' is adopted
+
\subsection{The Resource Management Act 1991}
The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) is the overarching
@@ -95,6 +101,31 @@ under the RMA
management. \parencite[p 31]{sadler}.
\end{quote}
+
+\subsubsection{The role of sustainable development}
+
+- broad definition of ``environment'' is adopted
+``Social Assessment'' (Taylor et al in the Green Book, chapter 25)
+\begin{quote}
+ The New Zealand Resource Management Act (1991) is regarded by many as the
+ foremost and most innovative national legislation for environmental assessment in recent
+ years. This act has included mandatory requirements for the assessment of environmental
+ effects, with “social,” “cultural,” and “amenity values” clearly included in the definition
+ of environment. Also required are public involvement and community consultation, and
+ monitoring of effects once the plan or project has begun.
+\end{quote}
+
+% TODO: RMA and SEA
+% ``Social Assessment'' (Taylor et al in the Green Book, chapter 25)
+% \begin{quote}
+% It provides a comprehensive framework with a single
+% purpose of promoting “the sustainable management of natural and
+% physical resources” (Section 5).
+% \end{quote}
+
+
+\subsubsection{Decentralised environmental management}
+
Interestingly and somewhat unusually in international comparison, the
RMA shifts the main responsibility of resource management activities
to local authorities rather than imposing a prescriptive management
@@ -134,36 +165,13 @@ integrated management of natural resources.
DISTRICT / city councils
-
+\subsubsection{Coordination and cooperation}
This overlapping mandate clearly requires special efforts to ensure coordination ...
TODO: must mention consultation steps in RMA! check miller2010implementing
-TODO: public participation through notification
-
-
-
-TODO: RMA and SEA
-
-
-
-
-
-\subsection{SCRATCH SPACE}
-
-``Social Assessment'' (Taylor et al in the Green Book, chapter 25)
-\begin{quote}
- The New Zealand Resource Management Act (1991) is regarded by many as the
- foremost and most innovative national legislation for environmental assessment in recent
- years. This act has included mandatory requirements for the assessment of environmental
- effects, with “social,” “cultural,” and “amenity values” clearly included in the definition
- of environment. Also required are public involvement and community consultation, and
- monitoring of effects once the plan or project has begun.
-\end{quote}
+\subsubsection{The role of the public in plans and resource consents}
-\begin{quote}
- It provides a comprehensive framework with a single
- purpose of promoting “the sustainable management of natural and
- physical resources” (Section 5).
-\end{quote} \ No newline at end of file
+TODO: the evolution of a plan
+TODO: public participation through notification \ No newline at end of file