diff options
| author | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-06 11:49:47 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-06 11:49:47 +0800 |
| commit | b356399e154bdfc2576334cca190c7d26f6730cd (patch) | |
| tree | 24ce0d0fbfa64b0eddc1edc49077dd5e8aa6563b /assignment1 | |
| parent | 78d73610bd8929945668be1de7b6c36113e5c448 (diff) | |
fix typo
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1')
| -rw-r--r-- | assignment1/discussion.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/discussion.tex b/assignment1/discussion.tex index d060daf..23a88b8 100644 --- a/assignment1/discussion.tex +++ b/assignment1/discussion.tex @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ applications to be considered \parencite{fookes}. % who perform the screening; public participation in plan development? The same problem exists for `Permitted Activities' whose impact is -considered too minor to warrant an assessment of effect. The RMA does +considered too minor to warrant an assessment of effects. The RMA does not demand an assessment of the cumulative impacts of `Permitted Activities'. According to the RMA Survey 2010/2011, a surprisingly large percentage of regional councils (91\%) carried out monitoring |