diff options
author | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-06 21:50:12 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-06 21:50:12 +0800 |
commit | a9998bae259fe189d930f8378d96a569d2ab2521 (patch) | |
tree | 933e0650f562eb4f913946bd450263bb9f5817fa /assignment1 | |
parent | bcbd4f56e72f7f0aeaa083ef6928d12a8346fff2 (diff) |
susdev / SEA
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1')
-rw-r--r-- | assignment1/main.tex | 65 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 37 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/main.tex b/assignment1/main.tex index 87e09c2..4aaef5f 100644 --- a/assignment1/main.tex +++ b/assignment1/main.tex @@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ adverse significant biophysical, social and other relevant effects'' of such proposals ``prior to major decisions being taken and commitments made'' \parencite{principles}. -% TODO: sustainable development - In order to provide decision-makers with sufficiently detailed insight into the potential positive and negative effects of a project on the environment, the participation of all parties that would be affected @@ -47,7 +45,13 @@ activities \parencite{principles}: identifying the key impacts that are associated with the project. \item[\emph{Consideration of alternatives.}] - %TODO: important. Spend a little more time on this. + + Since EIA is mainly intended to be a tool to assist + decision-making, practicable alternatives must be presented for every + proposed activity, including the option not to do anything. This step + ensures that EIA does not turn into an expensive documentation + exercise for planners and decision-makers; it is essential for + effective EIA. \item[\emph{Impact analysis, mitigation, and evaluation of residual impacts.}] @@ -97,6 +101,23 @@ statutes and is generally considered to be the first piece of integrated sustainability legislation in the world \parencite{rma-guide}. + +\subsubsection{The role of sustainable development} + +In recognition of the inherent limitations of project-level +EIA---including the difficulty of assessing cumulative impacts, the +lack of integrated assessment of effects at a wider scope, and the +narrow focus on direct impacts of assessed proposals---the RMA does +not institutionalise the standard EIA process but provides for an +integrated approach to ``the sustainable management of natural and +physical resources'' (Section 5). In line with this purpose, the RMA +adopts a very broad definition of the term `environment'---including +communities, amenity values, social and cultural conditions (Section +2(1))---and its mandatory requirement for the assessment of `effects' +applies to policies, plans and projects alike. In principle, the RMA +is thus closer to an implementation of Strategic Environmental +Assessment (SEA) than to ``first generation'' EIA. + The RMA has been described as an ``effects-based approach'' to regulation \parencite{sadler}, as it does not intend to regulate human activities per se, but ``focuses on the regulation of the effects of @@ -111,36 +132,6 @@ guide and implement sustainable resource management'' \parencite[p 31]{sadler}. -\subsubsection{The role of sustainable development} - -% TODO - -%As the concept of sustainable development became more popular -%... scope of project-based impact assessment determined to be too -%narrow to ensure a progression towards sustainable -%development. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) ... -% -%- broad definition of ``environment'' is adopted -%``Social Assessment'' (Taylor et al in the Green Book, chapter 25) -% -%\begin{quote} -% The New Zealand Resource Management Act (1991) ... has included -% mandatory requirements for the assessment of environmental effects, -% with “social,” “cultural,” and “amenity values” clearly included in -% the definition of environment. Also required are public involvement -% and community consultation, and monitoring of effects once the plan or -% project has begun. -%\end{quote} - -% TODO: RMA and SEA -% ``Social Assessment'' (Taylor et al in the Green Book, chapter 25) -% \begin{quote} -% It provides a comprehensive framework with a single -% purpose of promoting “the sustainable management of natural and -% physical resources” (Section 5). -% \end{quote} - - \subsubsection{Decentralised environmental management} Interestingly and somewhat unusually in international comparison, the @@ -186,15 +177,15 @@ resource consents \parencite{furuseth}. As council has to address in plans and policy statements are mostly related to the sustainable management of natural or physical resources. Planning at the district level is constrained by these -regional plans and policies. % TODO? one more sentence; subdivision etc done at district level - - -\subsubsection{Plans and resource consents} +regional plans and policies. The plans and policies at the national, regional, and district level provide a framework for regulation of development activities. %TODO: the evolution of a plan; public participation in the evolution of plans + +\subsubsection{Resource consents} + For every proposed activity that is not explicitly allowed as a `Permitted Activity' in the appropriate regional or district plan, resource consent have to be obtained from the local authorities before |