diff options
author | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-01 09:28:14 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | rekado <rekado@elephly.net> | 2013-04-01 09:28:14 +0800 |
commit | fbf3626d732ed53ee209b4c6ab2544aef87d84ad (patch) | |
tree | 6e419abcad53a5d42af335a0242a158506e1e10f /assignment1/discussion.tex | |
parent | 048801aeaaf676e3a3ed6b1c7f71eb7d40b98714 (diff) |
move quotes to discussion
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1/discussion.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | assignment1/discussion.tex | 24 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/discussion.tex b/assignment1/discussion.tex index 03b10ae..379f6be 100644 --- a/assignment1/discussion.tex +++ b/assignment1/discussion.tex @@ -44,6 +44,29 @@ the process of EIA for the public to be involved; where involvement is possible monitoring of effects once the plan or project has begun. \end{quote} +``Environmental Assessment in a Changing World'' (EAE_10E.PDF, Sadler) +\begin{quote} (page 49) + [EA under the RMA] ... is indirectly specified for policy + statements and strategic plans which local authorities are required to + prepare to guide and implement sustainable resource + management. Application at this level is variable and, overall, it is + concluded that the unique way that EA is integrated into the Act makes + evaluation of the effectiveness of implementation difficult +\end{quote} + +(page 164[pdf], 146[published]) +\begin{quote} + SEA is intended to be an integral part of + policy and plan-setting, rather than being applied to them as a + separate procedure. The resulting framework, in turn, establishes a + context and parameters for subsidiary EIAs, which are required for all + resource use consents and where the presumption is for protection via + rigorous limits on discharges etc. However, in practice, + implementation of the Act is occurring slowly. Experience to date + indicates that local governments still rely on project EIA rather than + undertaking policy and pian-level assessments, +\end{quote} + checklist from \textcite{intl-perspective}: @@ -59,6 +82,7 @@ checklist from \textcite{intl-perspective}: - problems of devolution: - cannot deal well with cumulative effects, because that's best done on a national/regional level \parencite{eia-state-of-the-art} - most resource consents are processed at the district/city level, not at the regional level + - \textcite[p 267]{furuseth}: little experience or resources to scrutinise EIA on the local level \textcite{practitioners} - volume of assessment work, enormous breadth in scale of covered projects |