summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment1/discussion.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-06 14:28:04 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-04-06 14:28:04 +0800
commit96a9680289c7a3bc7d6972f6b7a30dcf52831d40 (patch)
tree47cf4b7616cbc07d29497dea21a36cee51792d5a /assignment1/discussion.tex
parent14756ed0ca0d385c6d00a535c4dae3523da719a5 (diff)
remove "2008"
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment1/discussion.tex')
-rw-r--r--assignment1/discussion.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/assignment1/discussion.tex b/assignment1/discussion.tex
index 2115754..83ab131 100644
--- a/assignment1/discussion.tex
+++ b/assignment1/discussion.tex
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ participants primarily aimed to fulfill the requirements of the Fourth
Schedule in preparing an AEE and was not concerned with following
international EIA best practice \parencite{practitioners}.
-A 2008 review of constent processing performance by the Ministry for
-the Environment further revealed that councils rarely reject subpar
+A review of constent processing performance by the Ministry for the
+Environment further revealed that councils rarely reject subpar
resource consent applications as permitted by section 88(3) of the
RMA; much more often faulty applications are accepted and gradually
improved through requests for additional information in line with