summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-06-17 18:12:33 +0800
committerrekado <rekado@elephly.net>2013-06-17 18:12:33 +0800
commit50f9f116bfd2b04579fabedad3861388dc198544 (patch)
tree49638b92078e7a1b81f4d9be3bf606813acbf319
parent7d8f6919f6d8f3d66d56f4e293b16ccf3631c563 (diff)
cleanup
-rw-r--r--assignment3/background.tex16
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/assignment3/background.tex b/assignment3/background.tex
index e9319b7..adfd2f4 100644
--- a/assignment3/background.tex
+++ b/assignment3/background.tex
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ whether to notify or not is possibly contentious.
-\subsection{Submissions from the public and hearings}
+\subsection{Submissions, hearings and the officer's report}
For those applications that the responsible council has determined
will have impacts on the environment that are more than minor and that
@@ -135,29 +135,15 @@ input.
\section{Consultation and participation in EIA and the RMA}
-%While councils usually engange the public during the consultation
-%phases of the plan formation process, the picture on the resource
-%consent level is a different one.
refer to http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/rma/everyday/consent-consultation/
\subsection{AEE review and notification}
-- council reviews AEE and decides whether to notify or not
-
%beyond the requirements of the Fourth Schedule,
%however, there are few guidelines to assess the quality of an
%AEE \parencite{miller2010implementing}.
-
-
-% http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mediating+sustainability%3a+the+public+interest+mediator+in+the+New...-a0176372138
-\begin{quote}
-only those parties who make a submission on a notified consent
-application have standing to appeal a council's decision to the
-Environment Court.
-\end{quote}
-
% TODO: review course readings to find problems
\subsection{The implementation gap}