1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2017 08:29:19 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 14 04:29:18 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54721 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1cnhpW-0000Ig-O5
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:18 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54571)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpV-0000IT-2c
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpO-00014S-RV
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:11 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46586)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpO-00014O-PH
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:10 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45510)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpM-0005M2-GH
for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpH-00011R-KO
for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:08 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21020)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@example.com>) id 1cnhpH-00010f-E4
for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:29:03 -0400
Received: from localhost (xd933fe09.dyn.telefonica.de [217.51.254.9]) by
mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1489480138371144.2514938811363;
Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@example.com>
To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Subject: R: do not build recommended packages
X-URL: https://example.com
X-PGP-Key: https://example.com/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:28:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87h92w1cu0.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
This relates to bug 25598 “R packages are not bit-reproducible”. R
itself does not build reproducibly. One of the reasons is that it
includes recommended packages that are built in a random temporary
directory. The build paths for each of these packages is then embedded
in the packages’ “paths.rds” files.
We don’t have this problem when building the packages with the
“r-build-system” like any other R package.
This patch set adds package expressions for each of the recommended
packages, disables building of recommended packages, and adds some of
these packages to those R packages that need them.
I’ve successfully rebuilt all R packages to make sure that these changes
don’t break anything.
I also have an unpolished patch to fix bug 25598, but it depends on this
patch set.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://example.com
|
