summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>2009-08-13 00:32:36 +0200
committerJan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>2009-08-13 01:30:27 +0200
commit3fcb1f38d96cd2b5d49deebcde8b476ff96430e4 (patch)
treede750c4e73199299a74fda1e2c7eca1b8f963e83 /Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi
parent480e203052571809f1a11ee7c7728f08aa042fe9 (diff)
Doc: automated-engraving: build fixes and images.
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi16
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi b/Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi
index 6f28836bf6..566af1a4ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/automated-engraving/divide-and-conquer.itexi
@@ -7,19 +7,17 @@
@end ignore
-
+@node divide-and-conquer
@unnumberedsec Plan de campagne
Since content and form of a score are separate, we have to match that
in the design of software. Hence, the basic blueprint of our program
should follow this scheme
-@table asis
+@multitable @columnfractions .3 .3 .3
@item
-@tab
-
-@image{pictures/simple-notation,,,.png}
+@sourceimage{simple-notation,,,.png}
@tab
@@ -29,15 +27,13 @@ should follow this scheme
@tab
-@code{{ c'4 d'8 }}
+@code{@{ c'4 d'8 @}}
@item
-@tab
-
1. form
@@ -53,7 +49,7 @@ should follow this scheme
-@end table
+@end multitable
In effect, we are conquering the problem by dividing it into
subproblems
@@ -79,7 +75,7 @@ Finally, whenever you subdivide a problem, a new problem is created,
@divClass{float-right}
@divEnd
-Next: @ref{implementing-notation.html,Impressive, but does it also
+Next: @ref{implementing-notation,Impressive, but does it also
work in theory}? A practical approach to capturing notation.
@bye