summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>2012-05-23 12:11:08 +0200
committerAndy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>2012-05-23 12:29:15 +0200
commit2de74cb56e3af44ce624638facfa061603d39c0d (patch)
tree2e3619ce57be8d5009c1d63a28075e865d88fbdc
parent3f48638c8c82d7839b75204e475af691fcd67c33 (diff)
finish deprecating eval closures
* libguile/deprecated.h: * libguile/deprecated.c (scm_eval_closure_lookup) (scm_standard_eval_closure, scm_standard_interface_eval_closure) (scm_eval_closure_module): Deprecate these, as they are unused. * libguile/modules.h: * libguile/modules.c: Remove deprecated code. * module/oop/goops/util.scm (top-level-env, top-level-env?): Deprecate. * module/ice-9/deprecated.scm (set-system-module!): Deprecate. (module-eval-closure): Deprecate, by overriding the core definition to return a fresh eval closure. * module/ice-9/boot-9.scm (make-module): Don't set an eval closure on the module. (the-root-module, the-scm-module): Don't call set-system-module!.
-rw-r--r--libguile/deprecated.c79
-rw-r--r--libguile/deprecated.h8
-rw-r--r--libguile/modules.c63
-rw-r--r--libguile/modules.h8
-rw-r--r--module/ice-9/boot-9.scm78
-rw-r--r--module/ice-9/deprecated.scm14
-rw-r--r--module/oop/goops/util.scm21
7 files changed, 120 insertions, 151 deletions
diff --git a/libguile/deprecated.c b/libguile/deprecated.c
index a41f45461..61fa8e271 100644
--- a/libguile/deprecated.c
+++ b/libguile/deprecated.c
@@ -2743,6 +2743,82 @@ scm_current_module_lookup_closure ()
return SCM_BOOL_F;
}
+scm_t_bits scm_tc16_eval_closure;
+
+#define SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE (1<<0)
+#define SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE_P(e) \
+ (SCM_SMOB_FLAGS (e) & SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE)
+
+/* NOTE: This function may be called by a smob application
+ or from another C function directly. */
+SCM
+scm_eval_closure_lookup (SCM eclo, SCM sym, SCM definep)
+{
+ SCM module = SCM_PACK (SCM_SMOB_DATA (eclo));
+
+ scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning
+ ("Eval closures are deprecated. See \"Accessing Modules From C\" in\n"
+ "the manual, for replacements.");
+
+ if (scm_is_true (definep))
+ {
+ if (SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE_P (eclo))
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ return scm_module_ensure_local_variable (module, sym);
+ }
+ else
+ return scm_module_variable (module, sym);
+}
+
+SCM_DEFINE (scm_standard_eval_closure, "standard-eval-closure", 1, 0, 0,
+ (SCM module),
+ "Return an eval closure for the module @var{module}.")
+#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_standard_eval_closure
+{
+ scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning
+ ("Eval closures are deprecated. See \"Accessing Modules From C\" in\n"
+ "the manual, for replacements.");
+
+ SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_eval_closure, SCM_UNPACK (module));
+}
+#undef FUNC_NAME
+
+
+SCM_DEFINE (scm_standard_interface_eval_closure,
+ "standard-interface-eval-closure", 1, 0, 0,
+ (SCM module),
+ "Return a interface eval closure for the module @var{module}. "
+ "Such a closure does not allow new bindings to be added.")
+#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_standard_interface_eval_closure
+{
+ scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning
+ ("Eval closures are deprecated. See \"Accessing Modules From C\" in\n"
+ "the manual, for replacements.");
+
+ SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_eval_closure | (SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE<<16),
+ SCM_UNPACK (module));
+}
+#undef FUNC_NAME
+
+SCM_DEFINE (scm_eval_closure_module,
+ "eval-closure-module", 1, 0, 0,
+ (SCM eval_closure),
+ "Return the module associated with this eval closure.")
+/* the idea is that eval closures are really not the way to do things, they're
+ superfluous given our module system. this function lets mmacros migrate away
+ from eval closures. */
+#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_eval_closure_module
+{
+ scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning
+ ("Eval closures are deprecated. See \"Accessing Modules From C\" in\n"
+ "the manual, for replacements.");
+
+ SCM_MAKE_VALIDATE_MSG (SCM_ARG1, eval_closure, EVAL_CLOSURE_P,
+ "eval-closure");
+ return SCM_SMOB_OBJECT (eval_closure);
+}
+#undef FUNC_NAME
+
@@ -2751,6 +2827,9 @@ scm_i_init_deprecated ()
{
properties_whash = scm_make_weak_key_hash_table (SCM_UNDEFINED);
scm_struct_table = scm_make_hash_table (SCM_UNDEFINED);
+ scm_tc16_eval_closure = scm_make_smob_type ("eval-closure", 0);
+ scm_set_smob_apply (scm_tc16_eval_closure, scm_eval_closure_lookup, 2, 0, 0);
+
#include "libguile/deprecated.x"
}
diff --git a/libguile/deprecated.h b/libguile/deprecated.h
index e777d2f80..2970262b2 100644
--- a/libguile/deprecated.h
+++ b/libguile/deprecated.h
@@ -824,6 +824,14 @@ SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_lookup_closure_module (SCM proc);
SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_module_lookup_closure (SCM module);
SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_current_module_lookup_closure (void);
+SCM_DEPRECATED scm_t_bits scm_tc16_eval_closure;
+
+#define SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_P(x) SCM_TYP16_PREDICATE (scm_tc16_eval_closure, x)
+
+SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_eval_closure_lookup (SCM eclo, SCM sym, SCM definep);
+SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_standard_eval_closure (SCM module);
+SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_standard_interface_eval_closure (SCM module);
+SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_eval_closure_module (SCM eval_closure);
diff --git a/libguile/modules.c b/libguile/modules.c
index a7c0c0ce9..7b42a3d43 100644
--- a/libguile/modules.c
+++ b/libguile/modules.c
@@ -519,66 +519,6 @@ scm_module_ensure_local_variable (SCM module, SCM sym)
}
#undef FUNC_NAME
-scm_t_bits scm_tc16_eval_closure;
-
-#define SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE (1<<0)
-#define SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE_P(e) \
- (SCM_SMOB_FLAGS (e) & SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE)
-
-/* NOTE: This function may be called by a smob application
- or from another C function directly. */
-SCM
-scm_eval_closure_lookup (SCM eclo, SCM sym, SCM definep)
-{
- SCM module = SCM_PACK (SCM_SMOB_DATA (eclo));
- if (scm_is_true (definep))
- {
- if (SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE_P (eclo))
- return SCM_BOOL_F;
- return scm_call_2 (SCM_VARIABLE_REF (module_make_local_var_x_var),
- module, sym);
- }
- else
- return scm_module_variable (module, sym);
-}
-
-SCM_DEFINE (scm_standard_eval_closure, "standard-eval-closure", 1, 0, 0,
- (SCM module),
- "Return an eval closure for the module @var{module}.")
-#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_standard_eval_closure
-{
- SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_eval_closure, SCM_UNPACK (module));
-}
-#undef FUNC_NAME
-
-
-SCM_DEFINE (scm_standard_interface_eval_closure,
- "standard-interface-eval-closure", 1, 0, 0,
- (SCM module),
- "Return a interface eval closure for the module @var{module}. "
- "Such a closure does not allow new bindings to be added.")
-#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_standard_interface_eval_closure
-{
- SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_eval_closure | (SCM_F_EVAL_CLOSURE_INTERFACE<<16),
- SCM_UNPACK (module));
-}
-#undef FUNC_NAME
-
-SCM_DEFINE (scm_eval_closure_module,
- "eval-closure-module", 1, 0, 0,
- (SCM eval_closure),
- "Return the module associated with this eval closure.")
-/* the idea is that eval closures are really not the way to do things, they're
- superfluous given our module system. this function lets mmacros migrate away
- from eval closures. */
-#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_eval_closure_module
-{
- SCM_MAKE_VALIDATE_MSG (SCM_ARG1, eval_closure, EVAL_CLOSURE_P,
- "eval-closure");
- return SCM_SMOB_OBJECT (eval_closure);
-}
-#undef FUNC_NAME
-
SCM_SYMBOL (sym_macroexpand, "macroexpand");
SCM_DEFINE (scm_module_transformer, "module-transformer", 1, 0, 0,
@@ -936,9 +876,6 @@ scm_init_modules ()
#include "libguile/modules.x"
module_make_local_var_x_var = scm_c_define ("module-make-local-var!",
SCM_UNDEFINED);
- scm_tc16_eval_closure = scm_make_smob_type ("eval-closure", 0);
- scm_set_smob_apply (scm_tc16_eval_closure, scm_eval_closure_lookup, 2, 0, 0);
-
the_module = scm_make_fluid ();
}
diff --git a/libguile/modules.h b/libguile/modules.h
index dee77ff92..28df6c6ea 100644
--- a/libguile/modules.h
+++ b/libguile/modules.h
@@ -64,10 +64,6 @@ SCM_API scm_t_bits scm_module_tag;
#define SCM_MODULE_IMPORT_OBARRAY(module) \
SCM_PACK (SCM_STRUCT_DATA (module)[scm_module_index_import_obarray])
-SCM_API scm_t_bits scm_tc16_eval_closure;
-
-#define SCM_EVAL_CLOSURE_P(x) SCM_TYP16_PREDICATE (scm_tc16_eval_closure, x)
-
SCM_API SCM scm_current_module (void);
@@ -121,10 +117,6 @@ SCM_API SCM scm_module_public_interface (SCM module);
SCM_API SCM scm_module_import_interface (SCM module, SCM sym);
SCM_API SCM scm_module_transformer (SCM module);
SCM_API SCM scm_current_module_transformer (void);
-SCM_API SCM scm_eval_closure_lookup (SCM eclo, SCM sym, SCM definep);
-SCM_API SCM scm_standard_eval_closure (SCM module);
-SCM_API SCM scm_standard_interface_eval_closure (SCM module);
-SCM_API SCM scm_eval_closure_module (SCM eval_closure); /* deprecated already */
SCM_API SCM scm_get_pre_modules_obarray (void);
SCM_INTERNAL void scm_modules_prehistory (void);
diff --git a/module/ice-9/boot-9.scm b/module/ice-9/boot-9.scm
index a13e92591..f4ed1df38 100644
--- a/module/ice-9/boot-9.scm
+++ b/module/ice-9/boot-9.scm
@@ -1524,55 +1524,7 @@ VALUE."
;;; Every module object is of the type 'module-type', which is a record
;;; consisting of the following members:
;;;
-;;; - eval-closure: the function that defines for its module the strategy that
-;;; shall be followed when looking up symbols in the module.
-;;;
-;;; An eval-closure is a function taking two arguments: the symbol to be
-;;; looked up and a boolean value telling whether a binding for the symbol
-;;; should be created if it does not exist yet. If the symbol lookup
-;;; succeeded (either because an existing binding was found or because a new
-;;; binding was created), a variable object representing the binding is
-;;; returned. Otherwise, the value #f is returned. Note that the eval
-;;; closure does not take the module to be searched as an argument: During
-;;; construction of the eval-closure, the eval-closure has to store the
-;;; module it belongs to in its environment. This means, that any
-;;; eval-closure can belong to only one module.
-;;;
-;;; The eval-closure of a module can be defined arbitrarily. However, three
-;;; special cases of eval-closures are to be distinguished: During startup
-;;; the module system is not yet activated. In this phase, no modules are
-;;; defined and all bindings are automatically stored by the system in the
-;;; pre-modules-obarray. Since no eval-closures exist at this time, the
-;;; functions which require an eval-closure as their argument need to be
-;;; passed the value #f.
-;;;
-;;; The other two special cases of eval-closures are the
-;;; standard-eval-closure and the standard-interface-eval-closure. Both
-;;; behave equally for the case that no new binding is to be created. The
-;;; difference between the two comes in, when the boolean argument to the
-;;; eval-closure indicates that a new binding shall be created if it is not
-;;; found.
-;;;
-;;; Given that no new binding shall be created, both standard eval-closures
-;;; define the following standard strategy of searching bindings in the
-;;; module: First, the module's obarray is searched for the symbol. Second,
-;;; if no binding for the symbol was found in the module's obarray, the
-;;; module's binder procedure is exececuted. If this procedure did not
-;;; return a binding for the symbol, the modules referenced in the module's
-;;; uses list are recursively searched for a binding of the symbol. If the
-;;; binding can not be found in these modules also, the symbol lookup has
-;;; failed.
-;;;
-;;; If a new binding shall be created, the standard-interface-eval-closure
-;;; immediately returns indicating failure. That is, it does not even try
-;;; to look up the symbol. In contrast, the standard-eval-closure would
-;;; first search the obarray, and if no binding was found there, would
-;;; create a new binding in the obarray, therefore not calling the binder
-;;; procedure or searching the modules in the uses list.
-;;;
-;;; The explanation of the following members obarray, binder and uses
-;;; assumes that the symbol lookup follows the strategy that is defined in
-;;; the standard-eval-closure and the standard-interface-eval-closure.
+;;; - eval-closure: A deprecated field, to be removed in Guile 2.2.
;;;
;;; - obarray: a hash table that maps symbols to variable objects. In this
;;; hash table, the definitions are found that are local to the module (that
@@ -1780,7 +1732,6 @@ VALUE."
;; NOTE: If you change the set of fields or their order, you also need to
;; change the constants in libguile/modules.h.
;;
- ;; NOTE: The getter `module-eval-closure' is used in libguile/modules.c.
;; NOTE: The getter `module-transfomer' is defined libguile/modules.c.
;; NOTE: The getter `module-name' is defined later, due to boot reasons.
;; NOTE: The getter `module-public-interface' is used in libguile/modules.c.
@@ -1824,20 +1775,13 @@ VALUE."
(error
"Lazy-binder expected to be a procedure or #f." binder))
- (let ((module (module-constructor (make-hash-table size)
- uses binder #f macroexpand
- #f #f #f
- (make-hash-table %default-import-size)
- '()
- (make-weak-key-hash-table 31) #f
- (make-hash-table 7) #f #f #f)))
-
- ;; We can't pass this as an argument to module-constructor,
- ;; because we need it to close over a pointer to the module
- ;; itself.
- (set-module-eval-closure! module (standard-eval-closure module))
-
- module))
+ (module-constructor (make-hash-table size)
+ uses binder #f macroexpand
+ #f #f #f
+ (make-hash-table %default-import-size)
+ '()
+ (make-weak-key-hash-table 31) #f
+ (make-hash-table 7) #f #f #f))
@@ -2431,9 +2375,6 @@ VALUE."
;;; better thought of as a root.
;;;
-(define (set-system-module! m s)
- (set-procedure-property! (module-eval-closure m) 'system-module s))
-
;; The root module uses the pre-modules-obarray as its obarray. This
;; special obarray accumulates all bindings that have been established
;; before the module system is fully booted.
@@ -2445,7 +2386,6 @@ VALUE."
(let ((m (make-module 0)))
(set-module-obarray! m (%get-pre-modules-obarray))
(set-module-name! m '(guile))
- (set-system-module! m #t)
m))
;; The root interface is a module that uses the same obarray as the
@@ -2454,10 +2394,8 @@ VALUE."
(define the-scm-module
(let ((m (make-module 0)))
(set-module-obarray! m (%get-pre-modules-obarray))
- (set-module-eval-closure! m (standard-interface-eval-closure m))
(set-module-name! m '(guile))
(set-module-kind! m 'interface)
- (set-system-module! m #t)
;; In Guile 1.8 and earlier M was its own public interface.
(set-module-public-interface! m m)
diff --git a/module/ice-9/deprecated.scm b/module/ice-9/deprecated.scm
index b631b5f42..9d80cfe65 100644
--- a/module/ice-9/deprecated.scm
+++ b/module/ice-9/deprecated.scm
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@
turn-on-debugging
read-hash-procedures
process-define-module
- fluid-let-syntax))
+ fluid-let-syntax
+ set-system-module!))
;;;; Deprecated definitions.
@@ -884,3 +885,14 @@ it.")
(issue-deprecation-warning
"`close-io-port' is deprecated. Use `close-port' instead.")
(close-port port))
+
+(define (set-system-module! m s)
+ (issue-deprecation-warning
+ "`set-system-module!' is deprecated. There is no need to use it.")
+ (set-procedure-property! (module-eval-closure m) 'system-module s))
+
+(set! module-eval-closure
+ (lambda (m)
+ (issue-deprecation-warning
+ "`module-eval-closure' is deprecated. Use module-variable or module-define! instead.")
+ (standard-eval-closure m)))
diff --git a/module/oop/goops/util.scm b/module/oop/goops/util.scm
index 69bb898bf..af72bc3f5 100644
--- a/module/oop/goops/util.scm
+++ b/module/oop/goops/util.scm
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
(define-module (oop goops util)
- :export (mapappend find-duplicate top-level-env top-level-env?
+ :export (mapappend find-duplicate
map* for-each* length* improper->proper)
:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
:re-export (any every)
@@ -37,15 +37,18 @@
((memv (car l) (cdr l)) (car l))
(else (find-duplicate (cdr l)))))
-(define (top-level-env)
- (let ((mod (current-module)))
- (if mod
- (module-eval-closure mod)
- '())))
+(begin-deprecated
+ (define (top-level-env)
+ (let ((mod (current-module)))
+ (if mod
+ (module-eval-closure mod)
+ '())))
-(define (top-level-env? env)
- (or (null? env)
- (procedure? (car env))))
+ (define (top-level-env? env)
+ (or (null? env)
+ (procedure? (car env))))
+
+ (export top-level-env? top-level-env))
(define (map* fn . l) ; A map which accepts dotted lists (arg lists
(cond ; must be "isomorph"