\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*- @c %**start of header @setfilename ../../info/bovine @set TITLE Bovine parser development @set AUTHOR Eric M. Ludlam, David Ponce, and Richard Y. Kim @settitle @value{TITLE} @c ************************************************************************* @c @ Header @c ************************************************************************* @c Merge all indexes into a single index for now. @c We can always separate them later into two or more as needed. @syncodeindex vr cp @syncodeindex fn cp @syncodeindex ky cp @syncodeindex pg cp @syncodeindex tp cp @c @footnotestyle separate @c @paragraphindent 2 @c @@smallbook @c %**end of header @copying Copyright @copyright{} 1999--2004, 2012--2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. @quotation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''. (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and modify this GNU manual.'' @end quotation @end copying @dircategory Emacs misc features @direntry * Bovine: (bovine). Semantic bovine parser development. @end direntry @iftex @finalout @end iftex @c @setchapternewpage odd @c @setchapternewpage off @titlepage @sp 10 @title @value{TITLE} @author by @value{AUTHOR} @page @vskip 0pt plus 1 fill @insertcopying @end titlepage @page @macro semantic{} @i{Semantic} @end macro @c ************************************************************************* @c @ Document @c ************************************************************************* @contents @node top @top @value{TITLE} The @dfn{bovine} parser is the original @semantic{} parser, and is an implementation of an @acronym{LL} parser. It is good for simple languages. It has many conveniences making grammar writing easy. The conveniences make it less powerful than a Bison-like @acronym{LALR} parser. For more information, @inforef{Top, The Wisent Parser Manual, wisent}. Bovine @acronym{LL} grammars are stored in files with a @file{.by} extension. When compiled, the contents is converted into a file of the form @file{NAME-by.el}. This, in turn is byte compiled. @inforef{top, Grammar Framework Manual, grammar-fw}. @ifnottex @insertcopying @end ifnottex @menu * Starting Rules:: The starting rules for the grammar. * Bovine Grammar Rules:: Rules used to parse a language. * Optional Lambda Expression:: Actions to take when a rule is matched. * Bovine Examples:: Simple Samples. * GNU Free Documentation License:: The license for this documentation. @c * Index:: @end menu @node Starting Rules @chapter Starting Rules In Bison, one and only one nonterminal is designated as the ``start'' symbol. In @semantic{}, one or more nonterminals can be designated as the ``start'' symbol. They are declared following the @code{%start} keyword separated by spaces. @inforef{start Decl, ,grammar-fw}. If no @code{%start} keyword is used in a grammar, then the very first is used. Internally the first start nonterminal is targeted by the reserved symbol @code{bovine-toplevel}, so it can be found by the parser harness. To find locally defined variables, the local context handler needs to parse the body of functional code. The @code{scopestart} declaration specifies the name of a nonterminal used as the goal to parse a local context, @inforef{scopestart Decl, ,grammar-fw}. Internally the scopestart nonterminal is targeted by the reserved symbol @code{bovine-inner-scope}, so it can be found by the parser harness. @node Bovine Grammar Rules @chapter Bovine Grammar Rules The rules are what allow the compiler to create tags from a language file. Once the setup is done in the prologue, you can start writing rules. @inforef{Grammar Rules, ,grammar-fw}. @example @var{result} : @var{components1} @var{optional-semantic-action1}) | @var{components2} @var{optional-semantic-action2} ; @end example @var{result} is a nonterminal, that is a symbol synthesized in your grammar. @var{components} is a list of elements that are to be matched if @var{result} is to be made. @var{optional-semantic-action} is an optional sequence of simplified Emacs Lisp expressions for concocting the parse tree. In bison, each time an element of @var{components} is found, it is @dfn{shifted} onto the parser stack. (The stack of matched elements.) When all @var{components}' elements have been matched, it is @dfn{reduced} to @var{result}. @xref{Algorithm,,, bison, The GNU Bison Manual}. A particular @var{result} written into your grammar becomes the parser's goal. It is designated by a @code{%start} statement (@pxref{Starting Rules}). The value returned by the associated @var{optional-semantic-action} is the parser's result. It should be a tree of @semantic{} @dfn{tags}, @inforef{Semantic Tags, , semantic-appdev}. @var{components} is made up of symbols. A symbol such as @code{FOO} means that a syntactic token of class @code{FOO} must be matched. @menu * How Lexical Tokens Match:: * Grammar-to-Lisp Details:: * Order of components in rules:: @end menu @node How Lexical Tokens Match @section How Lexical Tokens Match A lexical rule must be used to define how to match a lexical token. For instance: @example %keyword FOO "foo" @end example Means that @code{FOO} is a reserved language keyword, matched as such by looking up into a keyword table, @inforef{keyword Decl, ,grammar-fw}. This is because @code{"foo"} will be converted to @code{FOO} in the lexical analysis stage. Thus the symbol @code{FOO} won't be available any other way. If we specify our token in this way: @example %token FOO "foo" @end example then @code{FOO} will match the string @code{"foo"} explicitly, but it won't do so at the lexical level, allowing use of the text @code{"foo"} in other forms of regular expressions. In that case, @code{FOO} is a @code{symbol}-type token. To match, a @code{symbol} must first be encountered, and then it must @code{string-match "foo"}. @table @strong @item Caution: Be especially careful to remember that @code{"foo"}, and more generally the %token's match-value string, is a regular expression! @end table Non symbol tokens are also allowed. For example: @example %token PERIOD "[.]" filename : symbol PERIOD symbol ; @end example @code{PERIOD} is a @code{punctuation}-type token that will explicitly match one period when used in the above rule. @table @strong @item Please Note: @code{symbol}, @code{punctuation}, etc., are predefined lexical token types, based on the @dfn{syntax class}-character associations currently in effect. @end table @node Grammar-to-Lisp Details @section Grammar-to-Lisp Details For the bovinator, lexical token matching patterns are @emph{inlined}. When the grammar-to-lisp converter encounters a lexical token declaration of the form: @example %token <@var{type}> @var{token-name} @var{match-value} @end example It substitutes every occurrences of @var{token-name} in rules, by its expanded form: @example @var{type} @var{match-value} @end example For example: @example %token MOOSE "moose" find_a_moose: MOOSE ; @end example Will generate this pseudo equivalent-rule: @example find_a_moose: symbol "moose" ;; invalid syntax! ; @end example Thus, from the bovinator point of view, the @var{components} part of a rule is made up of symbols and strings. A string in the mix means that the previous symbol must have the additional constraint of exactly matching it, as described in @ref{How Lexical Tokens Match}. @table @strong @item Please Note: For the bovinator, this task was mixed into the language definition to simplify implementation, though Bison's technique is more efficient. @end table @node Order of components in rules @section Order of components in rules If a rule has multiple components, order is important, for example @example headerfile : symbol PERIOD symbol | symbol ; @end example would match @samp{foo.h} or the @acronym{C++} header @samp{foo}. The bovine parser will first attempt to match the long form, and then the short form. If they were in reverse order, then the long form would never be tested. @c @xref{Default syntactic tokens}. @node Optional Lambda Expression @chapter Optional Lambda Expressions The @acronym{OLE} (@dfn{Optional Lambda Expression}) is converted into a bovine lambda. This lambda has special short-cuts to simplify reading the semantic action definition. An @acronym{OLE} like this: @example ( $1 ) @end example results in a lambda return which consists entirely of the string or object found by matching the first (zeroth) element of match. An @acronym{OLE} like this: @example ( ,(foo $1) ) @end example executes @code{foo} on the first argument, and then splices its return into the return list whereas: @example ( (foo $1) ) @end example executes @code{foo}, and that is placed in the return list. Here are other things that can appear inline: @table @code @item $1 The first object matched. @item ,$1 The first object spliced into the list (assuming it is a list from a non-terminal). @item '$1 The first object matched, placed in a list. I.e., @code{( $1 )}. @item foo The symbol @code{foo} (exactly as displayed). @item (foo) A function call to foo which is stuck into the return list. @item ,(foo) A function call to foo which is spliced into the return list. @item '(foo) A function call to foo which is stuck into the return list in a list. @item (EXPAND @var{$1} @var{nonterminal} @var{depth}) A list starting with @code{EXPAND} performs a recursive parse on the token passed to it (represented by @samp{$1} above.) The @dfn{semantic list} is a common token to expand, as there are often interesting things in the list. The @var{nonterminal} is a symbol in your table which the bovinator will start with when parsing. @var{nonterminal}'s definition is the same as any other nonterminal. @var{depth} should be at least @samp{1} when descending into a semantic list. @item (EXPANDFULL @var{$1} @var{nonterminal} @var{depth}) Is like @code{EXPAND}, except that the parser will iterate over @var{nonterminal} until there are no more matches. (The same way the parser iterates over the starting rule (@pxref{Starting Rules}). This lets you have much simpler rules in this specific case, and also lets you have positional information in the returned tokens, and error skipping. @item (ASSOC @var{symbol1} @var{value1} @var{symbol2} @var{value2} @dots{}) This is used for creating an association list. Each @var{symbol} is included in the list if the associated @var{value} is non-@code{nil}. While the items are all listed explicitly, the created structure is an association list of the form: @example ((@var{symbol1} . @var{value1}) (@var{symbol2} . @var{value2}) @dots{}) @end example @item (TAG @var{name} @var{class} [@var{attributes}]) This creates one tag in the current buffer. @table @var @item name Is a string that represents the tag in the language. @item class Is the kind of tag being create, such as @code{function}, or @code{variable}, though any symbol will work. @item attributes Is an optional set of labeled values such as @code{:constant-flag t :parent "parenttype"}. @end table @item (TAG-VARIABLE @var{name} @var{type} @var{default-value} [@var{attributes}]) @itemx (TAG-FUNCTION @var{name} @var{type} @var{arg-list} [@var{attributes}]) @itemx (TAG-TYPE @var{name} @var{type} @var{members} @var{parents} [@var{attributes}]) @itemx (TAG-INCLUDE @var{name} @var{system-flag} [@var{attributes}]) @itemx (TAG-PACKAGE @var{name} @var{detail} [@var{attributes}]) @itemx (TAG-CODE @var{name} @var{detail} [@var{attributes}]) Create a tag with @var{name} of respectively the class @code{variable}, @code{function}, @code{type}, @code{include}, @code{package}, and @code{code}. See @inforef{Creating Tags, , semantic-appdev} for the lisp functions these translate into. @end table If the symbol @code{%quotemode backquote} is specified, then use @code{,@@} to splice a list in, and @code{,} to evaluate the expression. This lets you send @code{$1} as a symbol into a list instead of having it expanded inline. @node Bovine Examples @chapter Examples The rule: @example any-symbol: symbol ; @end example is equivalent to @example any-symbol: symbol ( $1 ) ; @end example which, if it matched the string @samp{"A"}, would return @example ( "A" ) @end example If this rule were used like this: @example %token EQUAL "=" @dots{} assign: any-symbol EQUAL any-symbol ( $1 $3 ) ; @end example it would match @samp{"A=B"}, and return @example ( ("A") ("B") ) @end example The letters @samp{A} and @samp{B} come back in lists because @samp{any-symbol} is a nonterminal, not an actual lexical element. To get a better result with nonterminals, use @asis{,} to splice lists in like this: @example %token EQUAL "=" @dots{} assign: any-symbol EQUAL any-symbol ( ,$1 ,$3 ) ; @end example which would return @example ( "A" "B" ) @end example @node GNU Free Documentation License @appendix GNU Free Documentation License @include doclicense.texi @c There is nothing to index at the moment. @ignore @node Index @unnumbered Index @printindex cp @end ignore @iftex @contents @summarycontents @end iftex @bye @c Following comments are for the benefit of ispell. @c LocalWords: bovinator inlined