40efd12fe40f1d857ac5e9a101e193aa805714f5
[study/eia.git] / assignment3 / document.tex
1 \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
2 \usepackage{mystyle}
3 \bibliography{references.bib}
4
5 % length: 3000 words
6
7
8 \begin{document}
9 \input{title}
10 \tableofcontents
11
12 \pagebreak
13
14 \input{intro}
15
16 % Discuss the following statement:
17 %
18 % Councils often do not have the inclination to challenge an AEE,
19 % particularly if the development may bring benefits to the region. It
20 % therefore often falls to individuals or public interest groups to
21 % the thorn and challenge. \parencite[][pp. 110-111]{grinlinton}
22 %
23 % Your essay should consider the requirements for consultation in
24 % preparing assessments of environmental effects (AEEs) under the RMA,
25 % evidence supporting or refuting Grinlinton's statement and arrive at a
26 % conclusion on whether you agree or disagree with the statement based
27 % on the evidence you have identified.
28 %
29 % Illustrate your essay with practical examples. Use the maaterial you
30 % have collected in your clippings file of current environmental issues
31 % for this.
32
33 - Consultation is not mandatory under the RMA, but is encouraged
34 - results from consultation / mediation process are not binding
35 - the majority of applications is not publicly notified (council survey)
36 - there is a history of underestimating the size of the group of `directly affected' people
37
38
39 - government wants to shift power from the local councils to national entity, at the expense of community consultation
40
41
42
43 {\footnotesize{Approximate word count: 3000}}
44
45 \printbibliography[heading=bibnumbered]
46
47 \end{document}